For some time now I write on this subject Arquitectos.com.py rarely analyzed in our country, talking with colleagues, gathering expertise and researching the net, try to summarize the points that I think are most important to discuss.
10 years ago when I started to model on the market there was no more than 2 or 3 programs for this purpose, this time with the arrival of sketchup everything changed, the model is simplified and the usability of the program is for a 10 and older. Then the monopoly of google and could not be bought otherwise, google is like Murphy's Law in reverse, something that is very simple, it can make it simpler, and therefore more people will use it .
If we compare the prices with the rest of the world or the world nomas Mercosur, in Argentina we render hyper charged above the $ 300 amounts to 1.5 million Gs.
Returning to the subject matter, we said that when you start to handle one of these tools and does a good job of displaying your projects, and is trained to offer a service to others. Now the question arises, how much I charge? Or how do I charge?
There are several ways to use dogs, one is the "Masomenos" according to the face of customer error, the other is to put a price on hours of work, but here comes another question: how much my time?, Here we get on the topic of equilibrium point of a company or person, if you want to win 3 million a month, add that amount plus the fixed expenses you have and dividilo for hours monthly. Another way is to benchmark, or ask colleagues what they charge for the same work and receiving similar.
If you think about it, the costs of hardware to be used to provide the service, plus the cost of training and learning time to keep updated on the subject, plus additional costs of the workplace such as telephone, electricity, cleaning , minimum rent, some may say they are is their home and keep them, but someday they will have to keep some mouths, or have any material ambition at least.
For those few that are generally intermediate students of architecture, and the first teachers to abuse them, for those few who are paid 100 thousand for a hearing, it will destroy the market and will limit the possibilities to work with dignity in this profession of display .
If we compare the prices with the rest of the world or the world nomas Mercosur, in Argentina we render hyper charged above the $ 300 Gs, equivalent to 1.5 million, obviously have other expenses, another minimum wage and other cost life.
Here I propose a system to collect by m2, say it is not the best but we can establish a minimum standard to all Paraguayans viewers, and aims not only to earn well in our work, but to establish a code of ethics in the profession.
We propose a minimum of 4,500 Gs. per m2, which leaves a rule of law in March 1012, if we study this law know that preliminary work is preliminary + 20% of the table in Section 8 of this Act, and we take a ¼ of what it costs m2 approximately draft housing.
Thanks to the kindness of Sebastian Gaona display Paraguayan friend and member of the AVA (Association of Latin American Viewers) that I quoted provided a software partnership that consists of the following form.
For quotation to consider these variables:
(*) Significance
(0.0) points in addition = variable
- Viewpoint (**)
- exterior
- Camera Angle
- pedestrian (0.1)
- air (0.2)
- Camera Angle
- interior
- i. Equipment
- catalog (eg blocks) (0.1)
- request (eg, modeling furniture) (furniture x 0.2 x cm2)
- i. Equipment
- exterior
- Lighting (**)
- daytime (0.1)
- night (0.2)
- Design Type (******)
- Minimalist (eg traditional architecture) (0.2),
- style (eg heritage ornaments) (0.6)
- Rating Definition (*******)
- Schematic (eg sketchup) (0.2)
- Hyper (eg render) (0.7)
- Environment (**)
- Modeling (eg prisms) (0.1)
- Photo modeling (eg, modeling the whole environment) (0.3)
We suggest that Gs 4500 m2. minimum.
Variable results (0-2 pts) multiplied by the m2 model (if it gives the plant interior, if exterior facade m2 modeling.), Then the value we give to our m2, at least 4500 Gs. in this case.
Perhaps it is the simplest scheme, but if we analyze it is understood how to use it, the only thing to do is add up the points that will respond to the service requested by his client (an option for item), and multiplying the result variable by m2 to model and then the minimum value in m2, we propose since the minimum is 4500 Arquitectos.com.py Gs.
Here are a few examples, on the facade shows we 13mts x 6.50 m = 84.5 m2 of the façade, the client requested a viewing day, pedestrian, minimalist, with just sketch modeling environment.
If we add these points gives us the variable, (0.7) m2 = 59.1 x 84.5 x 4500 gs = Gs 266 000
The client was not very happy, and wants to be in hyper-realistic rendering, variable number we will be in (1,2) m2 = 84.5 x 101.4 x 4500 = 456 000 Gs Gs
Here we have the price difference between a sketch render as an example and a hyper-realistic rendering, a simple facade which can be for a home of our environment.
Assure a difficult task but not impossible, and it is time to make it, it will be to convince his client had always paid crumbs for hours of modeling and rendering, which have increased their prices because they have read this post.
To all who are dedicated to the display I hope your comments, if either the minimum that is one quarter of the approximate value of what they paid for 1012 according to the law draft, which we know very little, but it is the only term we can use legal argument. Or from their experiences, or what they want, is for the benefit of all
February 12, 2009 at 2:10 p.m.
I find it very important mail.
most of all the concern about this issue, it seems easy, but in the background are the rights of each laburante.
this shows how we should take it, and contributes its bit to people (clients) and ourselves (students and architects) take and take more seriously the profession.
regards
pablo.
February 12, 2009 at 2:10 p.m.
hello .. I am from Argentina and enrique sketchup model and render engines ..
I'm also trying to set a parameter to quote my projects .. because not all customers the same deal ... I have my projects are about between 250 and 400 dollars .. but usually try to convince my clients to buy the entire project .. because when it done is more advantageous for all views rendered out .. a matter of time ... hardware.
sketchup radically facilitated this type of work .. and many do not even enter the world of 3d studio ..
very interesting articles and works ... and I congratulate our colleagues and clients in this world that is the architecture ..
a hug
February 16, 2009 at 2:38 am
Hi all I found very interesting the system is to list the Renders and I would like to add also, that in other countries, on the one hand, is charged by the hour, ie the time it takes to model the scene definition depend on the degree of required by the client, and on the other hand is charged with another HOURS RENDER price, ie calculation time of the machine to generate the image with the finish as we want and rendering times depend on the parameters set out in materials and lights, as well as the configuration of the rendering program and that is where the quality of work varies in these two variables and quote ...
February 16, 2009 at 9:03 a.m.
Marcello such, if that's a tricky part, but you you can not pass a budget with a random variable price because nobody will want to accept something untrue that does not know how will have to pay, so in the system published an example there are considerable differences between a schematic and a hyper-realistic delivery.
Obviously everyone adjusting it to the way you work, but I repeat it is not feasible to deliver uncertain budgets, and less in these times of crisis or even psychological crisis rather, that all companies are adjusting their pants.
February 16, 2009 at 2:32 p.m.
That such mail, if I did not say that is the most accurate way to budget a render, but just wanted to highlight as a comparison because some time talking with a friend who studies architecture display in Greece and I was just talking to how charged for their work, it is obviously another country, another economy and jobs are also other contributions while my friend Achilles charging 4000 euros for work of animation of a house, I repeat that was just to have a benchmark of the quote in other countries for the same jobs, as well as Henry told us that Argentina will pay between 250 and 400 dollars.
May 22, 2009 at 2:28 p.m.
That such a friend, an interesting pattern you do, I have tried to implement it but I have several questions and give you an example to see if you help me, if we have a building facade 80 meters and 18 meters high, give us 1440 m2 façade , which makes prices go up greatly when we do the calculations for a single image. Is ta good time doing it that way?
May 23, 2009 at 1:42 am
I think as I said earlier ... you can also contribute by working hours and time to render, and if true contribution each form has its advantages and disadvantages, although this can only estimate a final cost estimate, as is the budget for the construction of a house but the other form of trading has also raised its problems as Carlos said, regarding the completion of the facade of a building. Well ... now imagine this scenario the project is made to a customer, and as so often enough, the customer brings pictures of homes of friends and tells you want the front of my house and keep this house and this guy as -so's house, then presents you render, the customer is not satisfied with the front and want to try as he will be failing in such-and with the roof as the house sultana ... well every change involves more hours of work the same project of the same square meters, as these changes cotizarían otherwise than for overtime that lead them? I believe there is easiest way to quote a more accurate rendering and either a home or a building for hours of work.
May 23, 2009 at 10:34 am
Carlos, in that case you take a single front and calculate the number of floors without xq these would multiply, ie, you would take the m2 of ground floor + a facade type.
23 May 2009 at 10:42 am
Marcello really the subject of hours is very relative, depending on how you work, your fixed costs, as you pretend monthly income, and how many hours you want to work daily, this is calculated based on the balance point and then there you have the time price for your work.
As you can see the variables are very different for each person or business, so we recommend the formula that is related to the 1012 law in a way.
May 23, 2009 at 5:40 p.m.
Nico such as I have another query CAD courses ... While we find some from 10000-50000 time, as could regulate how much should be charged or paid for these courses each ..
May 27, 2009 at 1:39 p.m.
Nico implement this scheme to 3D is to budget a good customer because you pass a cost estimate for the work, now I have a doubt, is the same as taking a view that 2 or 3 or 4 views ...? Ie the same 3D model just changing the point of view! If rendered in hyper-realistic view can take three hours and is not the same take a view in 3 hours than 4 in 12 hours and asked me ... ahh exterior-interior animation as well ... I can quote that ..? While we do take into account the facade and interior environments that are going to be using the same trading scheme but I think it would have other variables sumarle more to the work of animation, if the client wants even more realistic with people and cars moving, including text, soundtrack and transition effects ... I think all add on the complexity and quality of the work ... Well nose is an idea ... well ... What say!
May 27, 2009 at 9:40 p.m.
How to charge for the views of the same model, depends on how you're going to change the view, if logically from elsewhere will be charged separately, but it is a view of the same place and shaped but different angle or distance x, y, z, depends on the changes that you make in the modeling to be correct, is generally improves the environment and that they are charged as extra, and also the changes in lighting, you should charge a percentage of the first, the animation work and depends on entertainment seconds, charged per second.
May 28, 2009 at 11:45 am
Well thank you very much ... And the right would consider would be charged for each second of animation?
June 29, 2009 at 5:12 p.m.
hello all, a question, as 1Gs be equivalent to dollars? aka in Ecuador we use dollars and good, would not know to be equivalent costs, thanks
July 1, 2009 at 12:25 pm
Jose a dollar here in Paraguay costs 5,000 Gs., You should divide the result by 5,000, to take an approximate dollars.
August 8, 2009 at 8:17 p.m.
I think most right and proper on the implemented system thus provides an order and there are not many differences among colleagues. It is time and labor. If a charge for below normal make the work of others is too serious.
There are students and architects who do not handle these programs and many do not know or do not want to hand draw a perspective.
The logo design for a misereble trade are collected as are due by graphic designers.
I think the talent and skills of the players and artists should be paid accordingly.
Coupling I prefer this system and do a render a month to kill me doing 10 views rendered by Guarani miserable and lose my whole week.
The same thing happened when I did portraits in pencil. Today I have set my prices according to size and complexity according to certain parameters. That way I avoid problems and loss of time
August 19, 2009 to 7:44 p.m.
architecture is the best alternative pricing and programs to achieve them, is a specialty.
September 9, 2009 at 12:53 pm
Gentlemen, many of us suffer from the prostitution of others, also support the system set up.
Note that the ideal would be to charge using this system and add the plus to the other views and complete the round package, usually for rendering from another angle also must be added as first glance details were not necessary (outgoing, windows on the sides and things like that) therefore takes longer and becomes complex, I propose to add at least 35% of the cost of the first and augment this with regard to complexity, in this case having a cost of 300 000 gs in first , adding the second, third and fourth may charge a rounding of 800 000 in the case that the work on view front view side funds should increase this percentage to at least 80% for other elevations and increasing complexity ..
It is an opinion without much analysis therefore I can well be wrong.
But it is an interesting topic for all of us in class, I coupling in this system recovery and I hope you all do to stop work given ..
Regards
POSDATA
(It is good to discuss a price for the animation, charging per second)
September 10, 2009 at 5:31 p.m.
Gabriel
The subject of hearings, not a question of quantity but of quality I think, add 35% to Masomenos but is very viable.
Acordate the views are quoted per m2 main facade, if the same facade is to try to exploit the best point of view, this depends largely on the capacity of the display, so it is very important and have knowledge of RENDERS, ARCHITECTURE, ETC HAVE BASIC KNOWLEDGE PHOTO.
This is achieved by showing the customer times 640 x 480 preview eg., And indicating which is the best view in our opinion, something we are engaged, we must also advise modeling and rendering.
September 15, 2009 at 2:41 p.m.
How much to charge for a render? the answer for me is simple, cheaper than what your production system can afford, unlike Victor I do not like to render one of 10,000 units put price-priced units, because the currency is irrelevant, if not On the contrary, I 10 renders at a cost of 1000 units of price as 10 years ago I started in the render and I liked the work, however could not be visualized to make money with it, I thought that eventually, computers would move as any person would not need almost no knowledge to make a good render, but that has not happened ... we are within walking distance of it. My question would be worth investing a lifetime trying to learn to do a good render? I do not think that is the way to make money so how much to charge, at least for me is irrelevant. In Mexico there are companies that make only render at an approximate cost of 300 to $ 500, are known and their production systems are somewhat bureaucratized, ie have low-paid employees semiesclavizados produce renders which for those companies is a real business. I think there's prostitution work, as P. Gabriel said, there is free competition, is as simple as each person becomes what he considers right for their effort, and compete against something like that, it is also simple, with diagrams work more efficient. "I work in a design firm and do in my spare time renders, won in the company I work for the equivalent of 1200.00 per month and on weekends, I can generate two renders, which him up to 200 dlls., The Eventually, I make more doing renders out of the workplace, which in and lower cost, when you charge a render a very high cost, have several problems first and foremost, that the high cost, the client looks to be sumamante detailed you have to invest a lot of very expensive time-modeling-and second that the client will not consider small projects use the services of a render. When you receive in a modest way, you have more options, first you can sell more renders of a project and second, you end up doing renders bathrooms and furniture, which means constant work. It is obvious that the quality I offer, competition is not renders, but they are excellent quality for cost. In conclusion, I think before you want to charge, we must define what we as a company. Regards
September 15, 2009 at 8:53 p.m.
Manuel I think you're underestimating the profession, just cheap receivable is that you never could dedicate it exclusively, you yourself say your vision was with this I can not live, xq not earn enough, then instead of striving for excellence and receiving line your work and improve professionally, no, you reach the exit easier it is to work poorly, and since neither you value your effort then cobras cheap, in the end I guess you'll quit and live for a company employee.
There are displays or designers that some customers if they make a preferential price because they are constantly producing work for them, but that does not mean to give away their work.
It is right that in future there are web tools, each one will be able to design their home, but it will never reach the level of best possible solution as a Arquitetos / year planner, happens in every profession, the technology makes life easier, but in matters of creativity has still not overcome the brain trained.
September 16, 2009 at 0:02 am
Manuel.
I have worked in several companies and if .. is interesting to have a safe and separate salary earn a bonus. but in these cases this limits the possibility of success and progress .. with this I say to invest in a good-quality render better, that makes the difference and therefore it is worth claiming Podes ..
compared with the price I continue to support the motion to Nico ..
Greetings.
September 16, 2009 at 9:31 am
Manuel I think the price is not an important factor for a client to hire you again for another render, the client is going to call back if you like your job and if you prefer Render "so so noma" that do not impact on your customers and that therefore they do not sell the project ... well here is the response that you can not make money with this ... If you do not even value the work you like thinking ahead??
September 17, 2009 at 11:48 am
Gabriel Perez: Thanks for your comment, currently working half day on the job I have, I invite you to view my page, hqrender.com these renders you'll see there are low quality for me. Maybe I did not know to express myself.
Marcello: Same, please see my page, those are low quality renders for me, I think you're a bad idea to make money, make money for me, is not charging a 1000 dls render. I am an architect designer, not a draftsman, I think as a designer, designer collections and live, often believe that the road to success is to win more for a render, that's completely wrong, you'll never be able to charge a render, at least Mexico, I've had clients that make buildings more than 2 million dollars and do not want to pay a 200 dls render. It's just a matter of market. You're wrong as to progress, in three years, I have my own company, computer equipment, and legal and professional programs all based on the development of render "economic" is sad to read many of the responses that are in this forum; many people have the mentality too Latin. Regards
September 17, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Nico M. : Creo que estás equivocado en algunas percepciones del trabjo de hacer render; para mí un render es sólo una representación, si somos objetivos el render en sí mismo no representa nada, lo que vale es el diseño, es lo que se cobra y es a lo que yo me dedico. Yo no tengo un titulo de renderista, tengo un titulo de Arquitecto, a eso me dedico. En ningún momento me considero mediocre, trabajo en un despacho de diseño interior medio tiempo y tengo un pequeño despacho en que hago diseño interior y arquitectura. También te invito a ver mi página hqrender.com, sería interesante ver si tu percepción de que soy un mediocre es la misma, después de ver mis trabajos. Todos armamos nuestra actividad profesional como consideramos que funcionaría mejor para cada uno, para mí, la forma como trabajo y el valor que le doy a un RENDER es la que considero adecuada. Regards
18 Septiembre 2009 a las 9:44 am
Manuel lógicamente que la creatividad se paga mas que la visualización o representación, pero no es el debate en cuestión, si vamos mas allá la construcción también es mas rentable que cualquier diseño o visualización.
Puede ser que te haya interpretado mal, tus renders no son mediocres son buenos, pero como ya te dije, no estamos debatiendo el diseñar arquitectura ni construir, ni administrar, ni gestionar, ni peritar, ni fiscalizar, estamos debatiendo la profesión de los visualizadores de render en arquitectura exclusivamente.
18 Septiembre 2009 a las 12:33 pm
nico, me quitó las palabras de la boca, la representacion en render es una pequeña y opcional parte de un proceso de construccion, obviamente el diseño del arquitecto y los costos del proyecto sobrepasarian de largo el costo de un render, pero ese no es el tema a discutir.
Lo que el señor matamoros esta haciendo, a mi parecer, mas bien es incluir el trabajo de render como un valor agregado a sus proyectos, que como es aparentemente el caso de él, no es mayor problema puesto que ya se esta cobrando por el costo total de la obra.
Pero como dice nico, ese no es el caso a discutir.
Al menos como yo entiendo este tema, es que se esta discutiendo el costo que uno independientemente y hasta cierto punto desentendido con el proceso de diseño, debe cobrar por el render.
18 Septiembre 2009 a las 12:41 pm
Nico M.: Gracias por tu mensaje; nunca dije que mi trabajo fuera mediocre por que no lo es; para mí los renders que hago son de baja calidad porque les dedico cuando mucho 5 horas de trabajo, el resto lo hacen las máquinas. No importa a que se dedique una persona, lo que es importante es tener VISION EMPRESARIAL. De nada sirve que seas el mejor del mundo haciendo render si no sabes como vender y para vender hay que analizar tu mercado; ¿de que sirve que tu trabajo valga 500 dls, si el mercado no quiere o no puede pagarlo?. Te voy a poner un ejemplo, en México un proyecto de digamos 200 m2, en un despacho de arquitectos de prestigio vale mas o menos 15,000.00 dls; incluye arquitectura, ingeniería externa, diseño; ¿crees que por 2 renders uno exterior y un interior te van a pagar 1000.00 dls? es decir 500 dls por cada uno. Es como el 8% del valor total del proyecto, no lo creo. Ahora imaginate si en un despacho pequeño por el mismo proyecto, cobra 5000.00 dls, ¿te van a pagar 1000.00 dls? 20%, tampoco lo creo. Para mí todo es cuestión de mercado y tiempos de producción. Regards
18 Septiembre 2009 a las 13:22 pm
Manuel por personas como vos que se regalan se hace dificil COBRAR DIGNAMENTE por un trabajo de visualizacion, es por eso que esta profesion esta tan prostituida… te parece a vos que vale la pena invertir tanto dinero en cursos de dibujo, de 3d y render, de fotografia… mas todas las horas de entranamiento que necesitas para perfeccionarte para despues estar regalandose por monedas…???
18 Septiembre 2009 a las 15:39 pm
Edu: I may not explained or perhaps those who read the entries in this blog are unwilling to read what is written in a clear and objective. Again, this is not prostitution, it is to generate quality work and a process even if it is profitable, not present my work, I do it with efficient methods, so I can optimize costs, I DO NOT WORK MY GIFT just my time of production are lower, due to technology hardware and software I use and by the way, all legal. The programs are working, not me, my time is devoted to our clients and sell my product as simple as that. Want to earn more?, What allows you to collect the fruits worthy of your effort? do not render to the world championship, BECOME EFFICIENT generates a method that allows you to spend as little time as a project and generate higher quality is the simplest rule of competition in a market, whatever. Nobody will buy a product when there is a competitor offering the same quality of service, at a cost substantially better in Latin America and elsewhere in the world this is so, I did not invent the game, only take into my benefit. By the way, and related training courses, efficiently handling more than 200 programs, including VBasic, vray, 3DStudio max, sony vegas etc, etc, and I've never taken a training course. The training courses are the business of that train, not yours. Until you have defined a scope, a working model, and above all a product, you will spend your life thinking that everyone was given his job and because you do not have to accept coins humiliate you want to sell. Professional life happens pretty fast, if you have enough capacity to produce or market or the world, we will wait you're ready. Regards
September 18, 2009 at 4:10 p.m.
jose: Somehow your comment is right, you know it is difficult for a company to buy a render to an external consultant?, because there are thousands of recent graduates who are professionals and RENDER strongest weapon in that period of his professional life is make that work, a company hires, are doing the render after render after render, with illegal softwere, of course, until they get bored and quit, then go to another company and start again, and turn the company , re-hire a recent graduate and new cycle begins again, "as an external consultant, as I do to compete with that? the answer is the same that I have been raising, OPTIMIZATION OF TIME AND COST, you have to reach a point where the company you're offering your services, find it more attractive to hire an outside consultant, that having a baby semiezclavizado graduate, doing renders and of course that suits you to you. You see ads for your country in the Real Estate section and you'll realize that this is true, you'll see a lot of renders, the majority of low quality, obviously made by recent graduates. And you're right, the issue is how much to charge for the render, just that like all things, if you analyze the market and the situation in this market, you dream to be charged 10% of the value of a project, but it will not only unrealistic but completely Infact. Regards
September 18, 2009 at 5:29 p.m.
Manuel interesting experiences that you post on the blog, is quite right what you say on the issue of time and cost, or time is money, and here we get into marketing techniques that every architect should know much more than any other profession, perhaps, in marketing there are several business models, are the leaders, challengers, copiers and specialists are the ones with the niche and say the studies are much more profitable.
It is extremely important as you say, too, know to respect our customers are willing to pay, I think you're wrong that less than 10% do not want to pay at least here, because what you are looking from the side of the project only, and I think you need to know differentiate between clients and customers project builders, architects almost here many do not charge for a project, if the customer is given to build, because that is where the gain, this is very bad but is, as you say is the market (from the site we're trying to change that and show that if we respect the 1012 law governing the minimum professional fees going to help us all) continuing the idea, these are the customers who do not want to pay a 1% for a render, but it is also the architect that if you charge for your draft and you're willing to pay for good render that excited his client, also on the other side is good and builds large scale, which pays more still of a high quality work. Podes look out for some of the contributors to the site that renders live almost exclusively, such as Victor Baez.
I think you're very close to the neoliberal model is logical for your geographic location, but in the competitive market must also have values and professional ethics, and a bit of pride, but we will end up like the Japanese who work like ants have higher rates of alcoholism and suicide.
As a friend told me ing a few years ago, when I said I'm talking like crazy with a lot of work, and I answer, if you have a lot of work because cobras insurance is cheap.
September 19, 2009 at 10:44 am
what is wrong is to work for free ..
September 19, 2009 at 2:44 p.m.
Manuel I nose what is your intention here in the forum but you seem a really big mouth and nothing else ... you talk about that you got 10 years of experience, you drive more than 200 programs in an efficient, never had a training, spend thousands in hardware and licensing laws, which nobody asked you and indeed who would importaaaaaaaaaaaa ... and all that is not reflected in your work, as the saying goes, "Much ado about nothing"
September 19, 2009 at 11:26 p.m.
Hello friends, I'm from Argentina and new on this site. I analyzed the development is in the header and I found it very practical because the doubts have to set a value to our work comlplica not get out sometimes to normal values. Published by Henry (No. 2) I wonder if the dollar value is set according to the m2, hours spent, or global depending on the client, as is widely variable from 250 to 400 U $ S. In my case I asked for a second time quote for a rendering of a football field (now) to sell the idea to expand with new bleachers, perimeter fence and cabin broadcast. That would be the most suitable parameters to determine the value of a realistic rendering. Regards
September 21, 2009 at 11:56 am
Edu:No estoy de acuerdo contigo pero ¿tiene algún caso discutir si soy un bocón contigo o no?. No lo creo. Quizá algún día pienses más de lo que lo haces ahora. No invertí miles de dólares, o quizá me puedas mostrar en dónde escribí eso… si no, pues el bocón es otro. Que tengas un buen día.
23 Septiembre 2009 a las 10:46 am
José luis que tal, te cuento que podes utilizar el software cotizador de nuestro sitio, http://arquitectos.com.py/publicidad/cotizador-3d-renders/ y en el caso de proyectos de gran escala, deberías seleccionar escala urbana y nivel minimalista, esto reduce el costo porque no es viable cobrar lo mismo que un proyecto que se modele a escala edilicia o industrial.
16 Diciembre 2009 a las 18:41 pm
Hola que tal, apenas hoy me encontre con esta discusion entorno a como cobrar los renders. Yo soy de México y con respecto a lo que mencionaba el sr.Manuel Matamoros, en Mexico y seguramente en muchas partes de america latina si es posible vivir honorablemente ejerciendo el oficio de Infografo, Visualizador o Renderizador, como prefieran decirlo, yo recien egrese de la carrera de arquitectura pero llevo mas de 4 años trabajando como freelance en el area, (pueden ver algunos de mis trabajos en mi blog de deviantart, jessanchez.deviantart.com) por lo que tengo la fortuna de tener ya mi cartera de clientes que producen proyectos constantemente y requieren el servicio, y pues si efectivamente estamos lejos de que nos paguen lo mismo que en otros paises, pero igual hagamos cuentas ya que en nuestros paises la vida es mucho mas barato, las rentas, los alimentos, etc, por lo que a traves del tiempo he ido trabajando en un cotizador personal muy similiar al que uds presentan donde incluyo la mayoria de los factores que pueden influir al momento de cotizar, desde la cantidad de trabajo con que uno cuente actualmente, la relacion formal con el cliente (cliente constante u ocasional), costos del mercado, urgencia del trabajo, dificultad de materiales a renderizar (cristales, agua, etc), resolucion final deseada (para fines de impresion en gran formato por ej.),asi como incluir un pequeño porcentaje de depreciacion de equipo, desde mi computadora hasta mi coche, ademas de los factores que uds incluyen en su cotizador, asi que pues dos proyectos con igual cantidad de m2 de superficie pueden variar considerablemnte de precio, espero sea util mi aportación, y saludos.
30 Marzo 2010 a las 11:01 am
Al fin se toma en serio la digitalización, una profesión de estos tiempos. Muy buen aporte a la comunidad. Ya la envié a medio mundo para que se enteren y lo tengan en cuenta.
Gracias a los que lo hicieron posible.
Un saludo cordial a los amigos de arquitectos.com.py
30 Marzo 2010 a las 22:56 pm
Nora podés utilizar el cotizador de render del portal directamente aquí: http://arquitectos.com.py/publicidad/cotizador-3d-renders/